Grasslands are responding to climate change almost in real time, according to research
Although all ecosystems are affected by a changing climate, the impacts can take a while to appear. Changes in forest biodiversity, for example, are known to lag behind changes in a habitat’s temperature and precipitation.
Grasslands, on the other hand, are responding to climate change almost in real time, according to new research by the University of Michigan. Put another way, forests accumulate climate debt while grasslands are paying as they go, said the study’s lead authors, Kai Zhu and Yiluan Song.
“Climate change does have consequences for our ecosystems. It’s going to come sooner or later,” said Song, a postdoctoral fellow at the Michigan Institute for Data and AI in Society. “Grasslands are at the faster end of the spectrum.”
This work will help the scientific community better understand and predict the impacts of climate change, said Zhu, associate professor at the U-M School for Environment and Sustainability. The work will also provide key insights for the restoration of grassland vegetation.
“If you want to restore grasslands, you have to ask what types of species you will plant,” Zhu said. “In order to answer that, you need to at least take climate change into consideration.”
The research team reported its findings in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution.
The team, made up of researchers from more than a dozen institutions, amassed data from years of observations across grassland communities located in what’s known as the California Floristic Province.
Within this biodiversity hotspot that stretches along the U.S. West Coast, the team documented trends for 12 sites observed over decades. The researchers found that, as the climate in the region became hotter and drier, species that preferred those kinds of conditions became more dominant in plant communities.
The team also included results from long-term global change experiments in the region, enabling the group to show that climate change is able to drive the changes in communities.
“We know correlation doesn’t imply causation,” Zhu said. “But the experimental data allow us to attribute the causality.”
The team characterized the climate preferences or niches for various species in the region. The researchers could then quantify shifts in plant communities in direct relation to temperature and precipitation changes.
This approach yielded a clear, consistent conclusion across the studied observational and experimental sites, which Zhu and Song said is uncommon for an ecological study like this.
But what stood out even more was the pace of the ecological change, they said. It was fast and comparable to the observed rate of changes in climate. And the researchers stressed that this rapid shift in plant communities should not be seen as adaptation—at least not without further studies.
“To me, adaptation gives a positive impression that the system is changing to counter some of the negative effects of climate change,” Song said. “The rapid shifts in grassland communities involve not only the gain of some hotter, drier species but also the loss of some cooler, wetter species. These shifts might have negative consequences such as dominance by non-native species and loss of biodiversity.”
Although their study focused on a single region, Zhu and Song believe the results will hold in other grasslands, provided they’re interpreted in the context of a given region’s climate dynamics. For example, if the climate is trending warmer and wetter, species that are more at home in those conditions will likely start taking over at a speed that matches the changing climate.
“I would hypothesize that we may see an even greater response to climate change in other grasslands around the world,” Zhu said.